Your professors are brilliant in their fields. They've spent decades mastering their subject, publishing research, and advancing human knowledge.
But here's what nobody tells you: being an expert in molecular biology or Renaissance literature doesn't make someone an expert in learning science. And some of the study advice that gets passed down in academia is straight-up wrong.
These five myths are still taught by well-meaning professors everywhere—and following them might be tanking your GPA.
You've heard this a thousand times: pre-reading helps you follow the lecture better. And technically, that's not wrong. But here's what the research actually shows: pre-reading without a strategy is mostly a waste of time.
Students who passively read a chapter before class don't perform significantly better than students who come in cold. Why? Because passive reading creates an illusion of familiarity without actual understanding. You recognize the terms in lecture, which feels like learning, but recognition isn't the same as recall.
What actually works: Pre-questioning, not pre-reading. Before class, spend 5 minutes scanning the chapter headings and creating questions you expect the lecture to answer. "What causes enzyme inhibition?" "Why did the Roman Empire fall?" Now you're actively listening for answers instead of passively absorbing information you'll forget in 48 hours.
This takes a fraction of the time and produces better results.
This one is practically sacred in academic culture. Your professor probably rewrote their notes as a student. Your parents probably did too. The problem? It's one of the least efficient study methods that exists.
Rewriting notes feels productive because you're physically doing something. But research on learning consistently shows that passive review (which includes copying and rewriting) produces weaker memories than active recall.
Think about it: when you rewrite notes, what are you actually doing? You're looking at information and copying it. At no point are you forcing your brain to actually retrieve anything. It's like watching someone else do pushups and expecting to get stronger.
What actually works: Close your notes and try to recreate them from memory. This is harder and more uncomfortable than rewriting, which is exactly why it works. Every time you successfully retrieve information from memory, you strengthen that neural pathway.
Even better: use tools that do the note organization for you so you can skip straight to studying. Snitchnotes can turn your lecture recordings into structured notes in minutes, which means you're not choosing between "messy notes" and "hours of rewriting." You get clean notes without the busywork, leaving more time for actual practice.
Are you a visual learner? Auditory? Kinesthetic? This framework has been taught in education courses for decades, and it's almost completely unsupported by evidence.
Multiple large-scale studies have found no benefit to matching teaching methods to supposed "learning styles." Students who are told they're "visual learners" don't actually learn better from diagrams than from lectures. The whole framework is based on intuition, not data.
The real issue: everyone learns complex concepts best through multiple modalities. Reading about cellular respiration, seeing a diagram, hearing an explanation, and physically acting out the process all reinforce different aspects of understanding. Limiting yourself to one "style" actually restricts your learning.
What actually works: Multimodal learning. Attack every concept from multiple angles. Read about it, watch a video, draw a diagram, explain it out loud, and do practice problems. The redundancy isn't wasteful—it's building a richer, more accessible memory.
The logic sounds reasonable: create a dedicated study space, and your brain will automatically shift into "study mode" when you're there. Classical conditioning, basically.
Except research shows the opposite is often true. Students who study the same material in different locations actually perform better on tests than those who study in a single location.
Why? Context-dependent memory. When you always study in your dorm room, your memories become tied to that specific context. During the exam—which takes place in a completely different room—you've lost all those contextual cues. Studying in varied locations creates memories that are less dependent on any single environment.
What actually works: Study in 2-3 different locations. Library, coffee shop, empty classroom, your room. The variety helps you build memories that are accessible regardless of context—like during an exam.
Obviously, find places where you can actually focus. A loud bar doesn't count. But mixing it up between a few productive spots is better than sticking to one.
Highlighting feels like studying. You're engaging with the material, you're making decisions about what's important, you're creating a visual hierarchy in your notes.
Unfortunately, highlighting ranks among the least effective study strategies in learning research. Like rewriting, it creates an illusion of engagement without forcing actual retrieval.
Even worse, highlighting can give you false confidence. When you review highlighted notes, everything looks important and familiar. But familiarity isn't learning. You can recognize information without being able to recall it on an exam.
What actually works: Instead of highlighting, annotate with questions. When you encounter important information, write a question in the margin that the information answers. "What are the three stages of cellular respiration?" "What caused the stock market crash of 1929?"
Now when you review, you're not just recognizing highlighted text—you're actively trying to answer questions, which forces retrieval and builds stronger memories.
Snitchnotes takes this a step further by automatically generating quiz questions from your notes. Instead of hoping you highlighted the right things, you can immediately test yourself on the actual content—which is what your exam will require anyway.
All five myths share something in common: they feel productive without requiring much mental effort.
Real learning is supposed to be harder than that. If studying doesn't feel somewhat difficult, you're probably not actually studying—you're doing busywork that feels like studying.
The strategies that actually work (pre-questioning, active recall, multimodal learning, varied contexts, self-quizzing) all require more cognitive effort. They're uncomfortable because they force your brain to work.
That's the point. Easy studying = weak memories. Difficult studying = strong memories.
You probably can't overhaul your entire study approach overnight. But you can make one change today:
Replace one passive strategy with one active strategy.
Instead of rewriting your notes tonight, close them and try to write everything you remember. It will feel harder. You will miss things. That struggle is the learning happening.
Instead of highlighting your textbook, write questions in the margins. Then come back later and answer them without looking at the text.
Instead of reading passively before class, spend 5 minutes creating questions you expect the lecture to answer.
Small changes compound. A semester of slightly better studying produces dramatically better grades than one desperate week of cramming.
Want to spend less time on busywork and more time on studying that actually works? Try Snitchnotes for free at snitchnotes.com—turn your lectures into organized notes and AI-generated quizzes automatically.
Notes, quizzes, podcasts, flashcards, and chat — from one upload.
Try your first note free